A method of classifying entities relies on specifying necessary and sufficient attributes. Under this framework, an item belongs to a category only if it possesses all the required characteristics. For instance, a square is defined by having four equal sides and four right angles; an object lacking either attribute cannot be classified as a square. This approach attempts to establish rigid boundaries for categories based on clear, objective criteria.
Historically, this classification strategy provided an initial foundation for cognitive science. The appeal lies in its promise of clarity and objectivity, offering a seemingly straightforward way to organize knowledge. However, attempts to define most real-world categories using this method have encountered significant challenges. It struggles to accommodate the inherent variability within categories and the ambiguity often present in everyday concepts. Many categories lack universally agreed-upon defining features, making it difficult to establish strict boundaries. Furthermore, typicality effects reveal that some members of a category are considered “better” examples than others, a phenomenon not easily explained by rigid definitions.